Migrating your test automation from Ranorex

Ranorex has served many teams well, but if you're dealing with test maintenance headaches or unreliable automation, it might be time for a change. At TestResults, we take the hassle out of migration by handling the transition as part of your onboarding, no need to start over or manually rebuild everything.

Our approach is different. We don't just move your tests; we optimize them. Ranorex's UI-driven automation can be fragile, leading to frequent test failures. With TestResults, your automation is more stable, reducing the need for constant fixes. Our AI-driven execution also adapts to UI changes, so minor updates won't break your tests.

Making the switch doesn't mean your team has to struggle through a long learning curve. We guide you step by step, ensuring a smooth transition. You don't have to manage everything yourself, our team helps set up a system that works for you from day one.

If you're wondering about integrations, test compatibility, or how this will impact your current workflow, we're happy to answer any questions. Migrating from Ranorex is an investment in reliable, future-proof test automation, let's talk about how we can make it work for you.

Frequently asked questions

Is TestResults better than Rannorex?

TestResults is a strong alternative to Ranorex, especially if you want test automation that's easier to maintain. Ranorex tests often break when the UI changes, while TestResults is designed for stability, reducing the time spent fixing automation. It also scales better for growing test suites, making it a more efficient choice for long-term automation.

Does Ranorex use Selenium?

Ranorex has its own automation engine and doesn't rely on Selenium by default. However, it does offer integration with Selenium WebDriver, allowing tests to run on Selenium Grid for web automation. Even with this option, Ranorex is built as a standalone tool with its own test recording and scripting capabilities.

What are the disadvantages of Ranorex?

Ranorex tests can be difficult to maintain, especially when dealing with frequent UI changes. The scriptless approach works for basic tests, but more advanced scenarios often require coding.

Over time, test execution can slow down, making it less efficient for large-scale automation. While it supports multiple platforms, test stability can be a challenge, leading to extra effort in keeping automation reliable.